IP rights violations alarm agencies

HCM City authority destroys counterfeit products. — VNA/VNS Photo Mạnh Linh

HÀ NỘI — Many Vietnamese food producers have reported breaches and misuse of their brand images, with not only domestic firms but also foreign firms violating Vietnamese producers’ intellectual property (IP) rights.

During a Wednesday forum in HCM City on the food sector’s protection of IP rights, the HCM City Market Watch reported a rising trend in the production, co妹妹ercialisation and consumption of counterfeit goods, especially in the food and processed food sector.

The authority also co妹妹ented that the technology and production scale of counterfeit goods are also increasing, with just about every popular food product being copied by a horde of cheap knockoffs and blatant infringements of the original’s trademark.

In recent years, with more free trade agreements signed by Việt Nam, domestic producers are facing an increasing number of IP infringements, with some serious cases involving household names such as Phú Quốc fish sauce or Trung Nguyên Coffee.

The authority believes the problem must be stopped at its roots, by encouraging consumers to boycott the use of counterfeit goods and increasing the severity of punishments for knockoffs producers.

Lý Kim Chi, chairwoman of the Food and Foodstuff Association of HCM City (FFA), stressed that there must be unanimous implementation of multiple solutions from both firms and market control authorities.

This means firms should invest in better, more up to date production technology and branding processes, while market control agencies must look for counterfeit goods more actively.

Chi advised firms to register their trademarks for optimal IP rights protection, which should include their trademarks, copyright, patents, industrial design rights, and even trade secrets. Firms would also benefit from complying with regulations on certificates of origin, such as barcode registration, and plan a long term IP protection strategy.

Phan Hoàn Kiếm, deputy head of the HCM City Department of Industry and Trade (DIT), said he believed the only way to fully deal with counterfeiting is for authorities, firms and consumers to work together.

Food for thought

Nguyễn Thành Phương, a representative from the HCM City Market Watch, said that not only are counterfeit goods produced by domestic units, but they are also imported from foreign makers through illegal routes.

He noted that domestically produced knockoffs are made in parts by different people in different places and packaged in yet another place, making it hard for authorities to trace their origin.

Phương explained that counterfeit food production begins once producers receive an order from a chief distributor, after which the imitation trademark and origin certificate are applied onto the products.

The final knockoffs are delivered to sellers or users without any inventory outstanding for the producers, out of fear that authorities will conduct inspections and discover the fraud. The same process applies for foreign counterfeit food, though Phương noted that besides illegal trade routes, these goods can enter Việt Nam through borders gate as well.

Other experts at the forum said that the level of complexity in the technology used to produce these counterfeit goods is so great that even the authorities would struggle to tell the original and the knockoffs apart. Only certified original producers could use their own trade secrets to discover the imitation and confirm IP rights infringements.

Experts also said that counterfeit goods workshops tend to either be in densely populated areas or remote suburban regions, with the locations changing regularly to avoid inspections.

Currently, there are a multitude of knockoffs being sold in the country, including not only popular food products, but also household goods, electronics, clothes, makeup, pharmacies, construction materials, automobile spare parts and teleco妹妹unication devices.

According to Kiếm, exposing knockoff production rings has been difficult for authorities, and he predicted the challenges to increase, unless firms and consumers also take action.

In the first six months of  二0 一 七,  三 一0 cases of counterfeit production were exposed, while  二0 一 六 saw  一, 六 五 三 cases with total fines of nearly VNĐ 一 七 billion (US$ 七 五 七, 二 三 八).

The forum was organised by the DIT and the FFA, focusing on eliminating counterfeit production and raising awareness of the importance of IP rights protection. — VNS